Abu Ghraib Scandal.
When the United States military has a job to do crossways waters in the Middle East, it can be leaden to control what goes on and continually monitor actions there. For instance, in the Abu Ghraib prison house in Afghanistan prisoners be being mistreated by US soldiers. Not only are harsh and possibly brutal techniques being utilise, but soldiers also have abused prisoners for their aver satisfaction. In the former case, harsh or abusive research techniques should non be used regardless of the outcome. The United States should harbour their interrogation guidelines friendly with the Geneva Convention. The soldiers should not be winning advantage of their position and ab use or humiliating the prisoners for their own enjoyment. This is not only wrong, but it also represents the United States with a unfit image.
It can be argued that there is nothing wrong with using harsh and aggressive techniques for interrogation on the prisoners at Abu Ghraiub. The cogitate is that certain prisoners there may have very expensive information. The information may consist of future terrorist attacks, locations of terrorist groups or leaders, etc. Some say its perfectly fine and understandable to outrage prisoners rights in order to gain potential information that could remedy many lives.
The Geneva Convention was created in order to value the rights of prisoners of war.
The regulatory guidelines created keep a country from mistreating their prisoners and doing anything inhumane from them during interrogation. all types of torture or overly harsh and aggressive techniques that are not humane are illegal and cannot be used on prisoners. However, US officials requisiteed information from these prisoners, and have adequate their interrogation techniques for the situation. Cambone acknowledged he encouraged Miller to go to Iraq last August, when the US was desperate for information on the...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment