Globalization and its impact on the Public Sector Essay Example for Free

globalization and its impact on the Public Sector EssayINTRODUCTIONGlobalization post be seen as a virgin phase of internationalization of forcing companies and countries reciproc all in ally depend on degrees in the past. Here you kitty have globalization as the third phase of the internationalization of markets, the first of these phases properly called internationalization, ranging from late nineteenth century to the First World War, in which no economic sovereignty and international ex reassign and the fleck phase of Globalization, which runs from the end of World War II until near seventy years, time in which multinational companies begin to operate on a truly global basis (Peter, 2006). With the globalization of the modern world, businesses and government entities be forced to confront their results beyond its borders, in the fields of production quality and public administration, macrocosm necessary to rethink traditional management schemes within administratio ns. High competition forces that mitigate the quality of products and go and modernize the processes required must necessarily create a culture of modernity and innovation, on the faculty of the entities in the public and personal sector.The goal of globalization is no longer penetration neighboring market, but world trade, and standardizing it is the best instrument to achieve red-hot trade realities. Thus, this brings to light what is public administration, since it is closely tie in to what is trade and market._DISCUSSION_Administrators agree perceive the giving medicational environment as uncertain and turbulent of increasing complexity, and scram attention to the shape or style of thinking required to address more effectively the change phenomena. At present, the intensity and speed of global changes in the economic and tender environment determines the need to endure in advance the direction you point these changes and megatrends. The major changes atomic number 18 slow to form and once installed, its diverge is felt for a long time in individuals and organizations.In terms of some management specialists, the adaptability of the organization and therefore their ability to survive depends on its ability to learn and act upon the changeable environmental conditions. In understanding the phenomena that affect the public-private sphere, the State-Society is the major element in understanding the context in which hatch and informational processes and flows of the social world are developed.The State in its historic role as sociopolitical computer centralizer actions and decisions of socio-economic and cultural phylogeny of a country, is mentionized by being constituted by institutional relevance actors political weakenies and chemical groups, trade unions, universities, media communication, among otherwises, all active and engaged in the debate of major national issues participants. In this context, information channels are open and thus in the debate and discussion agendas are present from major structural changes to the discussion of basic problems of society, creating an interaction between all actors identified (Peters, 2001).From the change in the political dodge two elements characterize the bracing process the role of the state comes into question, and the discussion foc single-valued functions on the redefinition of it. Moreover, the market emerges as a newfangled player with that as well get outs a redefinition of public-private relationships. The private sector breaks into many fields hitherto copyrighted state action, the most notorious health, education and social security, resulting in double circuits of information public and private. prow changes in the early affect state-society relations are produced.The state is directing its own administrative decentralisation process and starts a new institutional frame croak.All these situations create new information flows in new directions and to new ta rget groups. Centralized information becomes part of the State surpassed role. The legitimacy of the information is questionable and of transmission line the reliability of it is also debatable. However, the changes that occur within the state and therefore in society begin to produce positive impacts on productivity levels, service efficiency, technological upgrade that streamlines the bureaucratic processes and a series of other events in the reformulation of the role of the state is designated as a profound reshaping of the state apparatus and at the uniform time, a substantial improvement of the State, as being able to regulate the production and processing of ternion in achieving social equity._Changes in Management Due to Globalization_Within this perspective comes hard on the thought of intelligence, applied to the social field in general as well as to a finicky organization. Concept defined as the ability to understand and even anticipate the behavior of the various env ironmental factors that affect or influence negatively or positively the development of a program or project.This advance knowledge is a prerequisite for organizing and planning the activities of organizations and individuals, in order to anticipate, minimize or macerate impact or influence of changes in the internal activities of the organization and its relations with the surrounding frame of acknowledgement . Some organizations have the ability to adapt quickly to change, naturally occurring in the joints between the various work areas. It allows them to survive in the turbulent environment, among other conditions, your creativity or ability to conceive and imagine alternatives and new solutions beyond the traditional frames or thought patterns (Farazmand, 2012).The organization ceases to be regarded as a mechanism and tends to be conceived as a living organism, endowed with intelligence. In this context we can speak of a collective intelligence internally structure the organi zations and allows them to react to changes in their environment also based on the use of information. Such organizations, also known as the third typeenterprises, the authors G. Archier and H Serieyx have the following characteristicsBe ever alert to events in the environment.Have organizational structures and rules that ensure flexibility and speed of adaptation.Individuals and groups articulate the organization and lend to their full potential.Each member of the organization is constantly exposed to market pressures and customer expectations.The organizations projects are conceived, divided up and accepted by all members of the organization.The work structures are focused on problems without choking the hierarchy.The organization ensures apiece official smart, useful, challenging work, also investing in the continuing education of staff._Productive Transformation Process_The marked quickening of scientific and technological change brings many challenges in the economic field , the need for flexibility from the production system to make competitive adjustments, to expand trade by way of differentiation. Each country must want to create in the international market its own space on the basis of new technologies (Farazmand, 2004).In the field of production of goods and services, the world is in one of the greatest moments of innovation and change, based on the knowledge-defined as the most expensive of the products of the modern era. Knowledge management supported by advances in information, computing and communications, offers possibilities of regenerationary change, creating opportunities for new technologies, competitiveness, new markets.In the public sector, production processes undergo changes to adapt to the new demands generated by the private sector in those areas in which the State assumed key roles in development. The scope, variety and extent of the changes, which are generated in the information sector, the new organizational paradigms, shoul d trigger an intensive process of studies and research in the area, so as to make the necessary adjustments in the production processes of information current and / or, when necessary, to design new components in these processes (James Van, 2004).Oriented dressing human resources policy focuses on the essential aspects of productive transformation growth and equity. The instruct of human resources in this context should also increase productivity, support worker flexibility to adapt to the changing needs of the productive sector. Technology policy should aim at substantiateing the productive transformation policies and strengthen national and regional innovation system. Must be well integrated with the industrial, agricultural, educational and trade policy. You can achieve your goals if a suitable economic and social environment, since the innovation process has a systemic character and requires several interrelated elements.The strategic dialogue, as proposed by ECLAC, comprise s a descend of explicit and implicit stretching agreements between the state and the main political and social actors around the productive transformation with equity, and also about the consequences policy and institutional innovations needed to achieve it. The economic transformation strategy posed ECLAC is conceived as part of the conditions of the international economy in the outer and maintaining macroeconomic stability, development financing, maintainingsocial cohesion and consolidation of participatory processes within (Gareth, 1988)._Transforming the Work Environment_Associated with global changes in the organizational structures should be considered external factors economic, social, political, technological and other as competition, labor market, etc. Such administrative language in examining the opportunities and threats presented by the environment to the organization and its members, comprising also analyze the implications that the forces of change are internal work processes in the organization. The work environment is undergoing major changes callable to the impact of external factors among other aspects of the new objectives that organizations are posed by the internationalization of the same, the transition from production companies to utilities, the need for human resources in technologies, by increasing interrelationships of public and private sector, etc.It is argued that the technological revolution affects the levels of employment, working conditions and social organization and the application of computer science, robotics and other automation involving a small group of overspecialized workers and a large number of unqualified workers. However, the forces of change can also arise within the organization or individuals that compose themselves. The work environment of the organization is under pressure from those who want change and those who rival tenaciously (Robert, 2009). The organization must adapt or fundamentally change strateg ies and plans created for different situations and contexts.In this scenario, the training of human resources is a must for the new management style component. Learning new technologies and developing new skills conducive to the efficient performance of individuals can not be absent from any policy to improve the work environment. While it is not the intent of this document describe enter multiple situations affecting the organizational structure and respective management approaches in solvingproblems, mainstreaming workplace transformation aims to support the understanding of the issues new organizational forms, examining the competitive environment, adaptation to the new, the educational needs of human resources and the occurrence of the information sector in all strategies of the organization._CONCLUSION_Globalisation has catalysed the need to accelerate public sector reforms in developing countries and the need to set up correctly-working institutions. The time is ripe for refor m. The challenge will be to adapt the model to different social, economic, political, jural and cultural contexts.REFERENCESFarazmand (2012), Chaos and Transformation Theories Implications for Organization Theory. _Public Organization Review_ 3(4)/2003 339-372James Van (2004). Resistance to Change and the quarrel of Public Organizations_Public Organization Review_ 4 (1) 47-74.Farazmand (2004). Innovation in Strategic Human Resource Management structure Capacity in the Age of Globalization. _Public Organization Review_ 4 (1) 3-24.Gareth Morgan (1988). _Riding the Waves of Change._ San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass (HR).Robert Golembiwski (2009). _Handbook of Organizational Behavior_, new edition. NY Marcel Dekker. french and Bell (1999). _Organization Development_ Englewood Cliff, NJ Prentice-Hall (HR). Connor and lake, _Managing Organizational Change_, 2nded. (1994)Peters, Guy (2001). _The Future of Governing_, 2nd ed., or the latest. Lawrence, KS University of Kansas PressSenge.Pete r (2006). _The fifth Discipline The Art and Practice of Learning Organization._ NY Random House/Garden City, NY Doubleday.Skinner, B.F. (1948, 1986, 2005), _Walden Two_ (small paperback$2-3 online), Hackett Publisher.