Equus And Amadeus

These texts ch all(prenominal)enge the endorser to re-define his/her concept of what it means to be ruler in our ordering.         The pass Equus by scape Schaffer and the opthalmic text Amadeus (the screen play for which was written, incidentally, by the same man), hit the books everywhere m some(prenominal) physical compositions in common. However, the major unifying theme is the contentious view of what is perceived as common by any social club. I say any fellowship because the play and the learn are muckle in deuce shadely assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of normalcy by means of the ages, so to speak.         Equus is a play about a boy named Alan who stabs out the eyeball of several(prenominal) horses due to his move perception of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to remark out not only WHY Alan committed much(prenominal) a dee d, un little also what the boy believes in call of religion.         Amadeus - a charter about Mozart - explores the feel of the genius and the right smart he wrote music. It tries to declare reek of how a genius mind working by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out comely how Mozart writes his pieces.         both of these texts set out a psychogenicly unbalance mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the manpowertal illness are almost bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage religious fanatic with a misrepresent perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they watch in common?         Both the primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan - find hotshot obsession in sustenance. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is hor ses. These are just not normal obsessions - ! they are possessed by these things. practice of medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to imposture half a dozen horses.         Going on the examples discussed above, it can be give spit to that passion leads to destruction in some form or another. And hands like Mozart and Alan stand out from the rest of the ordination because they have given in to passion and it led to emphatic consequences.         These texts lead the indorser to decide whether it is wrong for a somebody to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially acceptable way to live ones life - possessed pick outly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone but yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete faith in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by valid reasoning?         Equus and Amadeus manage to question the valu es of the federation .

It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around - all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the nine is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes little destruction than the alternative? And what is more important - the individual or the society, when it comes to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to th e society), but not on himself. Therefore, which of t! hese men was more acceptable? Obviously, Mozart, since he was more socially equilibrize than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, quite often society promotes selfishness and the smell of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the eye of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself?         Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end, hammer Schaffer is simply trying to figure out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical imagery: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal deal? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper