Compare and Contrast Two Works of Art

Anthony Arteaga Art History Ancient World Home crap assignment 1 Comp atomic number 18 and contrast the takings, concept, and the Formal Element of the twain flora of art. Also, explain which category this work falls in. The two elements I pass on chosen backside be found on page 200, material eubstance 6-51, strife of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa and on page 434, figure 14-8, scrap of the fizzle and Serpent. Not only did I choose these ingredients for their beauty, only overly because both works comport similar yet different subjects, concepts, and prescribed elements. Both of these images have subject matter that is the same even though theyre different.The subjects for the Battle of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa argon animals centaurs ( young-begetting(prenominal) and distaff), tiger, social lion, cheetah as well as a pelt and crude scenery. The subjects for Battle of the Bird and the Serpent argon animals peacock, a serpent, an d boos in an acorn manoeuvre. Both plots argon reputation based animals that live in a world where excerption of the fittest is reality. The of import difference between piece whiz and two is that in piece one centaurs ar mythological creatures and in piece two the animals ar not fictional.Both pieces have subjects that are the same however their concepts can be perceived as similar but different. Both pieces have themes that can be perceived as alike. The counterbalance gear image is a male centaur raising a boulder over his head to crush a tiger that has severely wounded a female centaur. The pelt almost his arm suggests he returned from a hunting expedition to find his love one, either lover or sibling, critically wounded by trine other(a) beasts and his facial expression is that of concern, instead of rage or fury. The concepts in this battle scene are protection, rescue, vengeance, self-defense, and/or survival.I use the word survival because the three feline bea sts are animals that motivating to eat as well. They need to eat like all animals and if at that place is no prey, then there is no food to survive. The wink piece is a peacock holding a dead serpent in its beak. The concepts in this piece are battle, victory, triumph, and dominance, when one creature overcomes another. Our textbook says that this scene is an allegory for Christ (peacock) tricking and overcoming the Tempter (serpent). The peacock has an expression of being removed to the outcome of the battle. Even though both pieces are about battle and bloodshed there are differences in the concept.In the jump piece the male centaur is the favored winner of the fight, because of his size, uncivil weapon, and his element of surprise. But regardless the outcome, he al puddle lost when the female centaur was killed. Whether he kills or is killed by the remaining felines, the female is gone and he cant bring her back. Unlike the indorse piece where there is an established win ner and loser. instantaneously that Ive discussed the concepts of these two pieces, Id like to talk about their orchis elements. The formal elements are sure elements that are used to describe the subject or image.The elements are ferment, texture, line, color, space, and values. The shapes in piece one can be found in the primer as geometric shapes. in that location is a triangular stone in one corner and a flat rectangular stone in the opposite corner. A cheetah is mounted on a cube, define to pounce. The boulder the centaur holds over his head is rectangular block. The scenery is mostly soaked shapes but the subjects have curves in their stubs and muscle tone. The shapes in the guerrilla piece can vary. In the peacocks wing, body, thigh, and tail you can see a closed tear- drop shape.There is a row of white circles on the birds neck and two rows of white circles on its wing. The tail has a leaf radiation pattern that matches the leaves on the acorn tree. The serpent ha s a circular pattern on its belly and a scaly pattern on its backside. There are geometric shapes in both pieces however, the geometric shapes are in general secluded to the circumstance in piece one and is inside the subjects body in piece two. In piece two, the shape in the peacocks tail and snakes body is organic. Also, the shapes in the earth are fuzzier and assumed in piece one where the shapes in piece two are sharper and more defined.Another formal element is texture. The first piece, according to the text, is a floor mosaic which is peaceful of many colored tesserae that were laid down in irregular, curving lines, which in effect imitated painted brushstrokes. The individual tiles are more apparent when viewed closely. This gives the piece a grainy and earthy texture, where it animal(prenominal)ly looks bumpy. The textbook says it has foreshortening, the illusion created on a flat surface in which figures and objects break through to recede or see to it sharply into s pace.The second piece was drawn with tempera on parchment. This makes the piece look smooth, flat, and two dimensional. The next element is color. The hues in both pieces are relatively earth toned. Both pieces have a low train of saturation. In piece one, the sky is mustard brown with a naval division of mint commonalty that frames the boulder that the male centaur is holding. The rocky scenery has browns and creams with a dull green and brown center. A bright green plot of ground of pine trees is in the corner that contrasts with the sky and rocks.The colors to the second piece are similar in the sense that it has low saturation. The colors are dull and warm. This piece utilizes reds and oranges, in the serpent, that the first piece does not. Because of the tan background, the green in the peacocks body emboldens the subject. The brown around its tail compliment the blue inside the tail. Lines are another element thats used. The lines in the first piece, which are made of many tiny lines and squares, are jagged and sharp. The sky and earth are divided by a jagged rocky background and the same can be state about the foreground.This creates a stage for the battle. There are jagged lines in the sky that frames the boulder being held. This piece has no physical lines that break-dance the body and background, which makes it look three dimensional. In the second piece, the acorn tree is a line (with branches) that adds to the images depth. There are lines inside the wing, beak, and talons. There is also a dividing line in both the serpent and in the body of the peacock. The physical lines in this piece separate the subjects and background making it look two dimensional and flat.Both pieces use lines to accentuate the subjects but the first piece has lines that are realistic and the second piece uses lines as borders for the subjects which makes it look more stimulate and less real. The next element that artists will use is space. The first piece has a female centaur lying on the ground with a tiger sprawled over her back end. Male centaur is looming over tiger with the dead lion behind him, both their legs overlapping, which also creates a three dimensional effect. A cheetah is on a cube in the background ready to pounce. The jagged foreground creates an illusion of a cliffs edge.In the second piece, the acorn tree is pivotal for establishing where the subject lies, giving it its depth. The serpent is hanging from the peacocks beak and coils beneath the bird. If the acorn tree was gone then the snake would appear to be free falling in empty space. Both pieces have uses depth, but the first piece appears to be more three dimensional where the second piece appears flat. The final element artists will use is value. The first piece has a dark to light value in the rocky scenery and in the shading in the animals, which also adds to its three dimensions.The second piece has a dark subject value and light background which contrasts each othe r. The body of the peacock has a darker green hue but is uniform there is no change in value in the subject. Both pieces have a dark to light value, but the first piece has variation of shades from one side of the piece to the other and within the subjects themselves. The second piece has dark subjects and a light background. Now that weve discussed the formal elements, the last topic is which category these two pieces are classify as.Certain works of art can be classified as representational, abstraction, and non-objective. The first piece is representational with an abstract background. Because of its hues, shapes, and shading the subjects are portrayed as three dimensional and proportional. Even though a centaur is fictional, it still looks realistic. However, the backgrounds contours and colors are vague making it more abstract. The second piece is abstraction because of its flat appearance, its bold colors, and the shape of the subjects eyes, wings, and tail.The patterns in an d around the tail and in the body also adds to its abstraction. The tree in the foreground does not look natural and the birds on the branches are unrealistic. Ive compared and contrasted the subjects, concepts, and the Formal Elements of two works of art. Also, I explained which category this work falls in. The two pieces I chose is Battle of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa and Battle of the Bird and Serpent. Both of these pieces have subject matter that can be compared similarly even though theyre different.