Libertarians Unethical in Respect to Poverty Essay -- Libertarian Polit

Poverty in the join States has long been a affectionate, political, and human rights issue. Few battalion would say that it is not our moral duty, as social human beings to take c be of those slight fortunate than ourselves, to the best of our ability. I say few because there be some people out there who believe that we have no moral obligation to do anything outside of ourselves. These types of people have what is called a libertarian viewpoint. There is really no specific definition of libertarian, but it is associates jurist with liberty andliberty itself with the absence of interference by other persons. In relation to the matter at hand, specifically poverty in America, libertarians are against taxing the affluent or forcing people to aid the starving and poor. adept of the most influential libertarians of our time is Professor Robert Nozik. His theory of justice begins with the set forth that all people have Lockean rights, which require that we refrain from inter fering with others. new(prenominal) than this we have no obligation to do anything positive for anyone else, and likewise, they have no obligation towards us. These rights are natural or inalienable because all human beings have them and they do not come from any social or political institutions. These rights forbid us from interfering with a persons liberty regular if it would promote some habitual good, or prevent anothers rights from being violated. Overall, the general idea is that people have the liberty to live a emotional state free from intervention of others, and can lead their life however they so choose. In addition, he says that if a person acquired their fortune or possessions without harming, defrauding, or violating the rights of any others, then it is morally perm... ...down to it, we are all the same. Some people have been fortunate enough to grow up in an surround that is financially, emotionally, and spiritually stable. Some people have not been so fo rtunate. Does this blotto that they should not be given the opportunity to try to make something of themselves so that they can change their respective situation? A society that employs a libertarian point of view is one that is regressing, not progressing. In India, the system of social forkes is still in effect. Whichever class a person is born into is the class that they remain a part offorever. Such a system offers no opportunity for advancement, and essentially is an example of a belief in the necessity of all people. It is sad to think that in a society as advanced as the United States, there are still those among us who would employ such systems, if possible.