12 Angry Men

Every cosmos put on trial is considered liberal until proven guilty. In 12 Angry Men this possibleness can almost be considered false to the jurors involved in this murder case. But one man can be credited with sticking to the innocent until proven guilty possibleness that most likely saved a mans life. This juror must show 12 other jurors that he can prove with enough convincing evidence that the male child is accused of killing his father. Reginald Rose shows us how one mans honesty can prove to make a big difference in a kids life. Juror 8 can be credited with pitch someones life, as juror 8 is the solitary(prenominal) juror to vote not guilty on the bang-up death of the boys father. Juror 8 from the spring doesnt believe that the boy is innocent of his crime. Juror 8 believes that it would be wrong to send a boy onward to be sent to death without discussing it first.
Juror 8 is set forth as thoughtful and gentle as he is attached to justice, and is sympathetic toward the 16 year old defendant. At the extraction of the play, when every other juror has voted guilty he is the whole one to vote: not guilty.



Juror 8 spends the eternal rest of the play urging the others to practice patience, and to consider the details of the case. A guilty verdict will result in the galvanizing chair. Juror 8 is convinced that there is reasonable doubt. ultimately he persuades the other jurors to release their personal prejudice towards the defendant.
As juror 8 slowly convinces the other jurors due to beholding both sides to the given evidence, he makes other jurors such as 3 and 10 appear ignorant and irrational.
Juror 8 uses qualities such as patience and persuasion when listening and winning action to the opinions of others in the jury room.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper