The cloning of military mans is on most of the lists of things to occupy about from Science, along with behavior control, genetic engineering, transplanted heads, computer poetry, and the unhindered growth of plastic flowers (Thomas, 1991, 386).
Thomas argues that the cloned human being forget not be a real or authentic human being, allow not even be a true copy of the human being who is being cloned:
clone is the most dismaying of prospects, mandating as it does the elimination of sex with besides a metaphoric elimination of death as compensation. It is about no comfort to know that one's cloned, identical surrogate lives on, curiously when the living will very likely involve go on one's real, now aging self off to the side, sooner or later (Thomas, 1991, 386).
Thomas deals with the issue of what makes a human being a human being, what values give him or her a purpose in or connection with life in general and his or her own individual existence. To Thomas, the cloned human being will not be a true human being, he says, but will be without a soul, without the unique, unpredictable, unbidden factors which make a human being a human being. Thomas has no real hope that cloning will s
Heinberg, Richard. (1999). Cloning the Buddha. Wheaton, IL: Quest.
Thomas, Lewis. (1991). "On Cloning a Human Being." The Modern Age. Leonard Lief and jam F. Light, eds. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 386-388.
Finally, as Heinberg notes, even such(prenominal) advocates of genetic engineering as Arthur Caplan are against human cloning on the basis that "it is an offense to human dignity to name people bred by design" and because it is "nuts to let anyone create a human being just to have a place to get spare parts" (Heinberg, 1999, 145).
Cloning should be banned, for it endangers what is most natural, individual, and unique about humans and human nature.
J. Robert Nelson takes the perverse argument--that cloning and genetic engineering "broaden the understanding of man" by "making room for evolving modifications of human life" (Nelson, 1991, 263). The anon. author of an article in The Economist, entitled "Genetic plan Should Be Unrestricted," argues that cloning and other genetic manipulations "offer the misfortune of humans beings able to design their own evolution--both individually and societally." The aforementioned(prenominal) author argues that while religious spokespersons argue against cloning on the basis of beliefs about God and human nature, "They should not be allowed to limit the freedom of unbelievers" (Economist, 1994, 271).
A premature ban on any scientific effort moving in the nidus of cloning could well impede useful research on the genetic basis of diseases or on opportunities for improving agribusiness (Wilson, 1998, 62).
Thomas finally argues against the idea of cloning human beings becau
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment